The Art of Voting: Harvie Branscomb in conversation
Video Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
The Art of Voting: Harvie Branscomb in conversation
- Publication date
- 2019-11-21
- Topics
- election monitor, voting, voting machine security, ballot secrecy, vote audit, voting, voting machines, ballot anonymity, election risk, hanging chad, precinct, DRE, Luksch, Branscomb
- Language
- English
- Item Size
- 9.3G
Harvie Branscomb is an expert on voting methods and the US electoral system, and an independent monitor of election quality. For over 20 years, he has developed recommendations and campaigned for accessible, fair, secure and transparent elections. In this video interview, Harvie discusses manual, mechanical, and electronic voting methods and their vulnerabilities, and his ideas for reform.
Credits
narrated by Harvie Branscomb
video by Manu Luksch
thanks to Mukul Patel
Segments
PART 1: ELECTION RISK
The electoral process has many points of vulnerability. What risks are inherent in specific voting methods? And how did foreign interference impact on the 2016 election?
PART 2: VOTING MACHINES
What has driven the introduction of mechanical and electronic voting methods? What were the consequences of the ‘hanging chads’ in the 2000 election? What specific risks accompany DRE (Direct Record Electronic) voting?
PART 3: VERIFYING VOTER INTENT
How voter intent may be incorrectly captured in the ballot.
Balancing voter accessibility, ballot legibility, and verifiability in machine voting. Obstacles to challenging the machine record.
What motivates the return to paper ballots? Designing audits to mitigate election risk.
PART 4: VOTER IDENTIFICATION
The impact of mechanisation on voter identification.
How well do photographic and biometric ID methods work, remotely and in-person? How can voter privacy be balanced with prevention of identity fraud?
PART 5: BALLOT ANONYMITY
Deanonymisation techniques can undermine the secrecy of the ballot. How can voter confidentiality be balanced with the transparency required during audit?
PART 6: REGULATION
How federal law lags, and state law accommodates, vendor innovation. Who owns elections? What conflicts of interests arise between voting machine vendors, election officials, and citizens.
PART 7: STATE, DISTRICT, PRECINCT
Localism in US democracy leads to specificity and complexity of ballot questions. How do districts on the ballot and precinct reporting impinge on verifiability and voter anonymity?
PART 8: THE CASE OF COLORADO
The state as innovator in voting methods. What are the benefits and drawbacks of universal mail-in ballots and centralised vote counts?
PART 9: POLITRICKERY
Targeted electioneering, truth in politics, and freedom of speech. Obstacles to candidacy and the advantages of incumbency. How might an alternative voting system address the perceived lack of choice among candidates?
PART 10: MAIL & INTERNET VOTING
Mail-in ballots in the western states of the US. How does Internet/online voting trade the risk of fraud and coercion for convenience? How does it compare with hand-marked paper ballots in terms of security and transparency? Could blockchain provide a solution?
PART 11: SEEKING ELECTION QUALITY
What motivates Harvie Branscomb’s concern with election quality? What critical properties must an ideal voting method have? Should voting be mandatory?
- Addeddate
- 2019-11-21 16:33:36
- Color
- color
- Identifier
- harvie_branscomb_election_quality_monitor
- Links
- http://predictive.cityabc.xyz/theartofvoting http://www.electionquality.com
- Scanner
- Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.4
- Sound
- sound
- Year
- 2019
Open Library


